My galleries depict usual cases rather than extremes. Most patients I see request natural appearing breasts which is what I have generally shown below.
The following cases are shown in approximate order of increasing breast volume. Variations in tissue types, chest wall projection and breast tissue ptosis are shown to illustrate how these factors influence the post-operative shape.
I have purposely not included the implant volume as the patients height, weight and body mass index cannot be determined from photographs and may give patients unrealistic expectations about the appropriate size for them.
A-cup. No breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup. No breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup. No breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup. No breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup after breast feeding. Subglandular round implant
A-cup after breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup. No breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup after breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup with minimal subcutaneous tissue. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup with fine mature stretch marks after breast feeding. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup with inverted nipple. Subglandular implant and inverted nipple correction.
A-cup with minimal ptosis. Subglandular implant.
A-cup with good subcutaneous coverage. Subglandular implant.
A-cup with Grade I ptosis. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup. Was E-cup whilst breast feedng. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup with Grade I ptosis. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup with Grade I ptosis. Subglandular round implant
A-cup with grade I ptosis. Subglandular round implant.
A-cup with grade I ptosis and redundant skin. Submuscular round implants.
A-cup with grade III ptosis and excess skin. Subglandular round implant.